How Much Does a Logo Design Cost? (2026 Price Guide)
Why logo prices range from nothing to six figures, what you actually get at each level, and how to work out which one your business needs right now.
The honest answer is that a logo costs between nothing and several hundred thousand, and both ends of that range are real prices paid by real businesses. That is useless on its own, so here is what separates the tiers and how to work out which you need.
What you are actually paying for
Almost none of the cost is the drawing. A logo takes a competent designer a few hours to execute once the decision is made. What you are paying for is:
- The decision itself — which of many possible directions is right for your market, and why.
- Technical durability — a mark that survives being small, one-colour, embroidered, etched or animated, without needing to be redrawn.
- The system around it — variants, spacing rules, colour specifications, type.
- Ownership — properly transferred, in writing, so you can trademark it.
- Risk reduction — someone checking it is not accidentally close to a competitor's.
The tiers, and what genuinely changes
Free — AI generators and template tools
Output is instant and often looks plausible. The problems are structural: templates are non-exclusive, so the same mark can be issued to other businesses; generated marks are typically supplied as raster images or messy auto-traced vectors; and the copyright position on AI-generated imagery is unsettled in both the US and the UK, which can make trademark registration difficult.
Reasonable for: testing an idea, a placeholder, something genuinely temporary. Not for: anything you intend to trademark or build on.
Low hundreds — marketplace freelancers
Real human work at speed. Quality varies enormously and the main risks are a single concept with no strategic alternative, missing vector files, and no written copyright assignment. All three are avoidable if you ask before ordering.
Reasonable for: a first identity when cash is genuinely tight and you accept you may redo it.
Several hundred to a few thousand — small studios
This is where a process starts being included rather than just an output: a real brief, multiple distinct directions, revisions that can change course, source files, and guidelines. For most small and mid-sized businesses this is the tier that produces something that lasts.
Tens of thousands and up — agencies
Buys research, naming, positioning, multiple stakeholder rounds, extended systems and legal clearance work. Justified when the cost of getting it wrong is very large — regulated industries, funded companies, anything with hundreds of touchpoints.
The question that actually decides it
Not "what can I afford" but: what does it cost me to change this later?
If you have no signage, no packaging, no printed stock and 200 customers, changing your logo next year costs an afternoon. Start cheap; that is a rational decision.
If you are about to print 10,000 units of packaging, wrap two vans, fit a shopfront and file a trademark, the logo is the cheapest part of that sequence and the only part that makes the rest worthless if it is wrong. Spend properly.
Where money is genuinely wasted
- Buying a logo when you needed a system. If you will produce anything regularly — social posts, packaging, print — you will spend the saving many times over in inconsistency.
- Paying for concept count. Fifty concepts is not better than four. It signals volume over judgement, and it pushes the selection work onto you.
- Paying twice because the files were unusable. The most common hidden cost of the cheapest tier: a printer or developer cannot use what you were given, and it has to be redrawn.
Our own packages are on the homepage, and if you would rather work out what you actually need before spending anything, send the brief — we will tell you if the answer is less than you thought.
Working on this yourself?
We design logos, brand guidelines, packaging and social kits in one studio — first draft in 24–36 hours, unlimited revisions and full copyright transferred in writing.